Generative AI use
Photographing or capturing problems and sending them to external chat or AI services to copy back the answers.
AKEO Exam
AI-proctored
fair online exams
From taking the exam to the report,
every step of exam operations is connected as a single flow.
New forms of cheating
keep emerging
Existing rules, designed only for in-person exams,
miss the new patterns of cheating that emerge in remote and hybrid exams.
Screen sharing · remote control
Getting outside help via TeamViewer, Discord, etc., or letting a third party take over the screen.
Imposters · multiple accounts
Someone other than the test-taker signs in, or multiple accounts are rotated.
AKEO Exam logs every one of those patterns as event and video records.
Three steps to fair exams
01
Design the exam
Configure questions, candidates, and exam policy in one place. You can pull questions from existing problem sets directly into the exam.
Question managementPolicy settings
02
AI proctors live
Tab switches, copy detection, and gaze-tracking are monitored in real time. When something looks off, the screen is captured automatically.
Event detectionVideo clips
03
Right through to verdicts and reports
We deliver suspected-cheating moments, grading results, and an achievement report.
Auto gradingPDF report
Core features that support your exams
Cheating monitoring
Video clips at suspected-cheating moments are auto-saved. Reviewers can jump straight to the suspicious segments.
Cheating · LIVE
00:05Tab switch
12:30Gaze off
25:15Normal
38:42No response
Auto grading & reports
Questions are graded automatically, and an achievement report covering correct rates and error patterns comes out as a PDF.
REPORT · 2026-04-26Done
Exam achievement report
92
Total
12/15
Correct
42:13
Time
Algorithms95%
Data Structures82%
Coding Practice67%
Custom policy
Cheating thresholds and event sensitivity can be tuned freely to match your institution's rules.
Exam policy settings4/4
Data-driven proctoring
We don't suspect on a hunch — we explain with the record.
Suspicious events over the exam timeline
See suspicious-event volume over the course of the exam at a glance, so you can focus monitoring on the right segments.
0 min30 min60 min90 min
Cheating recurrence rate
−90%
Avg. admin review time
−83%
Exam fairness trust
+95%
Easy to use, hard to break
Privacy protection
Data handling that complies with Korea's Personal Information Protection Act and your institution's regulations.
Secure storage
Exam videos and log data are kept in encrypted storage; users without access cannot view them.
Retention policy
Set a data retention period that matches your institution's policy — once it expires, data is deleted automatically.
Where it's used
University
Programming midterm
120 students · 1 TA proctorAuto grading and reports cut down the TA's workload.
High School
IT performance assessment
Per-class operation · End-of-term assessmentCoding-centric performance assessments run class by class.
Institutional
Certification & enterprise exams
Nationwide simultaneous · Post-auditUsed for nation- or company-wide official assessments.
Used together with
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
The questions we hear most often before adoption — answered here.
What happens if someone is wrongly flagged for cheating?
Admins make the call based on the video clip and event timeline. Test-takers can request a review through their institution's process, using those records as evidence.
What question types are supported?
Multiple-choice and free-form responses are both supported.
What if the network drops during an exam?
The candidate's progress is auto-saved and they can resume after reconnecting. Network drop-offs are logged on the timeline and used in the post-exam fairness review.
How many people can take the exam at the same time?
Up to 999 concurrent test-takers — class exams, large lectures, and certification exams are all covered.
Start running fair online exams today
Cover the proctoring blind spots with technology, and leave fairness on the record.